Research on Research Institute
Browse

Where next for metascience? Prospects, pitfalls & possibilities for the next 5 years. Talk by James Wilsdon at the AIMOS 2024 conference, Canberra, Australia. 19 November 2024

Download (4.1 MB)
presentation
posted on 2024-11-19, 03:24 authored by James WilsdonJames Wilsdon

After a decade of steady growth, metascience is exploding into the mainstream. Its simple premise – that we should turn the methods and tools of research back towards analysing and improving the research system itself – is increasingly being embraced by governments, funding agencies and research communities themselves.

Of course, these agendas aren’t new: metascience builds on rich interdisciplinary currents of research into R&D systems. But there is also a growing cadre of researchers, policymakers and practitioners – in universities, R&D-intensive companies, funding agencies, private labs and foundations – who are now deploying advanced methods and data to investigate and improve research systems, cultures and decision-making.

Worldwide, we see new initiatives, investments and alliances being set up to strengthen the field. To give a few examples: the UK, where the government has established an in-house Metascience Unit and UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) has set up a metascience grants scheme; Canada, which recently launched a new cross-agency funding call for meta-research; Germany, where the Volkswagen Foundation has a programme for “Researching Research”; USA, where the NSF is complementing its existing “Science of Science” funding program by working with the Institute for Progress to experiment with its funding methods; China, where a recent Shanghai Declaration for the Science of Science called for more sustained and ambitious investment in these fields; Ireland, where there is a drive to embed metascience in the new combined funding agency, Research Ireland.

In this talk at the AIMOS 2024 conference in Canberra, James Wilsdon takes a whistle-stop tour through this changing landscape, and highlights some metascientific movers and shakers, hotspots and lacunae. He argues that metascience is less a discipline, and more an orientation or mode of engaging with questions that almost all researchers encounter at some point in the networks and institutions they inhabit. Finally, he offers a few thoughts on metascientific possibilities of the present moment, and outlines five priorities for the next five years.

History

Usage metrics

    Research on Research Institute

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC